|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | The '''2020-2021 Quentinian Presidential Primary Debates''' were a series of political debates held by political parties in the [[United States of Quentin]], attempting to choose their candidates for the [[2022 Quentinian Presidential Election|2022 presidential election]]. Traditionally, there are two debates held by both the [[Mild RePublican Party]] and the [[Fundamentalist Party]] in 2020, and the first two were held by the Mild RePublicans and Fundamentalists respectively on October 24th and October 25th. The [[Quentinian Environmentalist Party|Environmentalist Party]] held its first primary debate on November 3rd, with the [[Freelance Party]] and other minor parties holding their primary debates in mid-November. After the November debates, the Mild RePublicans and Fundamentalists held their second debates on December 13th and December 6th respectively, with the Environmentalists having their second debates on January 5th. These debates lead up to the respective party conventions, including the [[2021 Mild RePublican Party Convention]], the [[2021 Fundamentalist Party Convention]], and the [[2021 Quentinian Environmentalist Party Convention|2021 Environmentalist Party Convention]], where the parties will choose their candidates.
| + | #REDIRECT[[2020-2021 Quentinian Presidential Debates]] |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | == Mild RePublican Debates ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | The format for all Mild RePublican primary debates is the [[Quentinian Debate Format]], which features a number of topics organized into a number of sections by the moderator. Each of these sections allow for statements by each of the candidates, which last the same for each candidate, and then an open forum where the candidates each have the same amount of time to contribute, and when they want to add to the open discussion, they press a time clock, beginning their time and stopping the time of whoever else was talking. This goes on until the conversation is resolved, and then the moderator moves on to the next section.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === October 24th ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | The first [[Mild RePublican Party]] debate was held on October 24th, 2020, and featured 9 candidates from around the country. Unlike in the second debate, all candidates who chose to run for [[President of the USQ|President]] under the Mild RePublican Party, registered with the [[Mild RePublican Debate Commission|party's debate commission]], and had support from at least one convention member were able to participate in the debate. The debate was held at [[Chris Lee Hall]] in [[Kindikil]], [[Desert Area|DA]] from 8:45 to 10:15 PM, and was covered by [[Diamond Television Network|DTN]] and [[Quentinian Broadcasting Corporation|QBC]] on television, and [[Tennomore Broadcasting System|TBS]] on radio and television. The moderators for the debate were [[Chrissy Teagan]], [[Jonathan McMillan]], and [[Gus Landry]] from the [[Quentinian Gazette]]. The event's ultimate ratings were the highest since 2008, as incumbent [[Kyle Lovestington]] decided not to run for the first time since then.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The participants of the first debate are listed below, along with their home state, prior experience, their preliminary polling percentages as determined by the [[Mild RePublican Polling Commission]], and one member of the convention who sponsored them for the debate.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :{| class="wikitable sortable" |Style: Width=85%
| |
| − | !width=20% | Candidate !! State !! Experience !! Preliminary Polling !! Convention Support
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Avanti Athavale]] || [[Desert Area]] || Bureaucratic Minority Leader || 23.3% || [[Liam Christen]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Steve Shamji]] || [[Chip Area]]|| [[GTNEC of the USQ|GTNEC]] || 18.7% || [[Doug Braintree]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Patrick Winslow]] || [[Snowland]] || State Representative Head || 13.4% || [[Kim Devenye]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[William Huelsenbekk]] || [[Long Beach Island]] || [[Governor of Long Beach Island]] || 12.9% || [[Clint Bobamakx]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Rajesh Muduganti]] || [[Kumar Area]] || [[Governor of the Kumar Area]] || 9.2% || [[Keeley Welsh III]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Riley Frye]] || [[Long Beach Island]] || Representative || 7.1% || [[Daniel Thorenson]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Jack Hamme]] || [[Grassland Area]] || Media Executive || 5.5% || [[Kristie Overhalse]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Quinn Jeremiah]] || [[Grassland Area]] || [[Grassland Area Secretary of Education]] || 5.5% || [[Jack Holden-Byron]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Janice Ellison Sr.]] || [[Multi-Logan State]] || Bureaucrat || 3.4% || [[David Roy]]
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Results'''
| |
| − | | |
| − | After the October 24th debate, polls were again taken by the [[Mild RePublican Polling Commission]], and below are the results after the debate.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :{| class="wikitable sortable" |Style: Width=30%
| |
| − | !width=98% | Candidate !! Polling !! % Change
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Avanti Athavale]] || 21.3% || -2%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Steve Shamji]] || 18.9% || +0.2%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Patrick Winslow]] || 11.4% || -2%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Rajesh Muduganti]] || 10.2% || +1%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Riley Frye]] || 9.1% || +2%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[William Huelsenbekk]] || 8.9% || -4%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Quinn Jeremiah]] || 8.5% || +3%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Jack Hamme]] || 6.5% || +1%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Janice Ellison Sr.]] || 4.2% || +0.8%
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | | |
| − | The top three performers in the debates as compiled by the [[Quentinian Gazette]] were Representative [[Riley Frye]], Governor [[Rajesh Muduganti]], and GTNEC [[Steve Shamji]], while the consensus worst performer according to many platforms was Governor [[William Huelsenbekk]], who dropped 4% in the polls after the debate. Some platforms praised the amount of diversity at the debate, as states such as [[Snowland]], [[Long Beach Island]], and the [[Multi-Logan State]] were represented, a change from the usual [[Desert Area]] and [[Grassland Area]] dominated Mild RePublican debates.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === December 13th ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Fundamentalist Debates ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | The format for all Mild RePublican primary debates is the [[Quentinian Debate Format]], which features a number of topics organized into a number of sections by the moderator. Each of these sections allow for statements by each of the candidates, which last the same for each candidate, and then an open forum where the candidates each have the same amount of time to contribute, and when they want to add to the open discussion, they press a time clock, beginning their time and stopping the time of whoever else was talking. This goes on until the conversation is resolved, and then the moderator moves on to the next section.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === October 25th ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | The first [[Fundamentalist Party]] debate was held on October 25th, 2020, one day after the Mild RePublican debate, and featured 10 candidates from around the country. Unlike in the second debate, all candidates who chose to run for [[President of the USQ|President]] under the Fundamentalist Party, registered with the [[Fundamentalist Party Debate Commission|party's debate commission]], and had support from at least three convention members were able to participate in the debate. The debate was held at [[Port Authority Channel Hall]] in [[Boston]], [[Maxx Area|MA]] from 8:45 to 9:30 PM, and it was covered by [[Diamond Television Network|DTN]] and [[Quentinian Broadcasting Corporation|QBC]] on television, and [[Tennomore Broadcasting System|TBS]] on radio and television. The moderators for the debate were [[Charles Barling]], [[Adam Cerstoff]], and [[Christina Fosley]], with Fosley and Barling being from QBC, and Cerstoff being from the [[Berlinsavis Gazette]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | The participants of the first debate are listed below, along with their home state, prior experience, their preliminary polling percentages as determined by the [[Fundamentalist Party Polling Commission]], and the three members of the convention who sponsored them for the debate.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :{| class="wikitable sortable" |Style: Width=100%
| |
| − | !width=20% | Candidate !! State !! Experience !! Preliminary Polling !! Convention Support
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Alexa Holcomb]] || [[Kahoot Area]] || [[Governor of the Kahoot Area]] || 23.9% || [[Tristan Gellert|Gellert]], [[Lisa Jadamakx|Jadamakx]], [[Bill Burtez|Burtez]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Tim Follingworth]] || [[Grassland Area]] || Bureaucratic Minority Leader || 13.1% || [[Turner Michaels|Michaels]], [[Riley Stimpekx|Stimpekx]], [[Dean ElRuiz|El Ruiz]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Paul Stroll]] || [[Snowland]] || [[Quentinian Secretary of Professions and Labor|Secretary of Professions and Labor]] || 10% || [[Jack Brown|Brown]], [[Christian LeMatez|LeMatez]], [[Jack Denzelez|Denzelez]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Randall Thompson]] || [[Maxx Area]] || [[Quentinian Secretary of Technology|Secretary of Technology]] || 9.3% || [[Dwight Ryan-Clark|Ryan-Clark]], [[Evelyn Cormac|Cormac]], [[Sophia Jones|Jones]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Dean Carnum]] || [[Kumar Area]] || State Representative || 9.2% || [[Jaxkson Cannahawhana|Cannahawhana]], [[Mike Jesuson|Jesuson]], [[Dell Compteur|Compteur]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Kristie Biller]] || [[Desert Area]] || Lawyer || 8.7% || [[Danielle Manziel Jr.|Manziel Jr.]], [[Christy Manziel|Manziel]], [[Natania Yu|Yu]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Gregory Thompson]] || [[Grassland Area]] || [[GTNEC of the USQ|GTNEC]] || 8.5% || [[John Smith-Rochelle|Smith-Rochelle]], [[Adam Benjamins|Benjamins]], [[Joseph Baddon|Baddon]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Jackie Reiders]] || [[Desert Area]] || [[Desert Area Secretary of the Treasury]] || 6.5% || [[Mina Khanes|Khanes]], [[Liam Joseph|Joseph]], [[Riley Titan|Titan]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Jognu Temmons]] || [[Desert Area]] || Warehouse Manager, [[2022 Quentinian House of Representatives Election|Representative Candidate]] || 5.6% || [[Ronald Bilius|Bilius]], [[Adithan Brie|Brie]], [[Jemmel Montagne|Montagne]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Lisa Miller]] || [[Maxx Area]] || State Attorney || 5% || [[Dolores Jameson|Jameson]], [[Anthony Ganmar|Ganmar]], [[Bus Garlanson|Garlanson]]
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Results'''
| |
| − | | |
| − | After the October 24th debate, polls were again taken by the [[Mild RePublican Polling Commission]], and below are the results after the debate.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :{| class="wikitable sortable" |Style: Width=30%
| |
| − | !width=98% | Candidate !! Polling !! % Change
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Alexa Holcomb]] || 34.6% || +10.7%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Tim Follingworth]] || 17.8% || +4.7%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Dean Carnum]] || 10.1% || +1.1%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Lisa Miller]] || 9.7% || +4.7%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Paul Stroll]] || 5.4% || -4.6%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Randall Thompson]] || 4.8% || -4.5%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Jognu Temmons]] || 4.7% || -0.9%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Kristie Biller]] || 4.5% || -4.2%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Jackie Reiders]] || 4.0% || -2.5%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Gregory Thompson]] || 4.0% || -4.5%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | | |
| − | The top performer was by far Governor [[Alexa Holcomb]], who received acclaim from a number of sources for her passionate performance and her layout of progressive policies. The top three in the debate as compiled by the [[National Political Observer]] were Holcomb, State Representative [[Dean Carnum]], and Attorney [[Lisa Miller]]. Many commentators noted that the Fundamentalist debate resulted in a few major frontrunners, including Holcomb, Carnum, Miller, and [[Tim Follingworth]] emerging from a group which was very well contested before the debate. This was the opposite of the Mild RePublican debate, which seemed to be more inconclusive. As a result of these results, the worst performing politicians were hard to list, however [[Paul Stroll]] emerged from the group as the worst performing, dropping 4.6% in the polls.
| |
| − | | |
| − | On November 3rd, [[Randall Thompson]] dropped out of the debate, in what was seen as a direct result of the first debate and his poor performance in it. Thompson notably clashed with fellow [[Cupboard]] member Paul Stroll during the debate, which resulted in a drop in the popularity of both even though they have each alleged it was simply good natured debate. Thompson also announced that day that he would be announcing himself as candidate for [[GTNEC of the USQ|GTNEC]] in the 2022 election, the first to do so in any party.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === December 6th ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Environmentalist Debates ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | === November 3rd ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | The first [[Quentinian Environmentalist Party|Environmentalist Party]] debate was held on November 3rd, 2020, and featured five candidates from across the country. Unlike in the second debate, all candidates who chose to run for [[President of the USQ|President]] as an Environmentalist, registered with the [[Quentinian Environmentalist Party Debate Commission|party's debate commission]], and had support from at least one convention member were able to participate in the debate. The debate was held at the [[Eisner Building]] in [[Livjessville]], [[Kahoot Area|KA]] from 8:00 to 9:30 PM, and it was covered by [[Diamond Television Network|DTN]] and [[Quentinian Broadcasting Corporation|QBC]] on television, and [[Tennomore Broadcasting System|TBS]] on radio and television. The moderators for the debate were [[Jan Leevers]] and [[Chrae Spraunt]], both from ''[[The Tough Opinion]]'' newspaper company.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The participants of the first debate are listed below, along with their home state, prior experience, their preliminary polling percentages as determined by the [[Environmentalist Party Polling Commission]], and the main member of the convention who sponsored them for the debate.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :{| class="wikitable sortable" |Style: Width=100%
| |
| − | !width=20% | Candidate !! State !! Experience !! Preliminary Polling !! Convention Support
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Clint Toll]] || [[Snowland]] || Executive National Security Adviser || 45.7% || [[Rebecca Lauxecz]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Gretchen DeArmant]] || [[Maxx Area]] || Former Environmentalist Activist || 22.9% || [[Claire Revishiose]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Dean Thomas]] || [[Snowland]] || Bureaucrat || 11% || [[Alissa Santiago]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Daniel Stevenson]] || [[Kumar Area]] || [[Quentinian Secretary of Nature|Secretary of Nature]] || 10.4% || [[Isaac Chan]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Xavier Ravenson]] || [[Grassland Area]] || Former [[Quentinian Secretary of Nature|Secretary of Nature]] || 10% || [[Bill Breckworth]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Results'''
| |
| − | | |
| − | :{| class="wikitable sortable" |Style: Width=30%
| |
| − | !width=98% | Candidate !! Polling !! Change
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Gretchen DeArmant]] || 47.1% || +24.2%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Clint Toll]] || 42.1% || -4.6%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Dean Thomas]] || 7.9% || -3.1%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Daniel Stevenson]] || 2.1% || -8.3%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Xavier Ravenson]] || 0.8% || -9.2%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | | |
| − | After the first debate, the frontrunners according to many analysts were [[Clint Toll]] and [[Gretchen DeArmant]], with [[Dean Thomas]] also maintaining the third place spot after the first debate. DeArmant was noted particularly for her energy on stage, and her noted radical policies and speaking passion, which was viewed favorably by Environmentalists around the country. While many analysts believe that Secretary [[Daniel Stevenson]] did well in the debate, his popularity declined, and along with [[Xavier Ravenson]] he dropped out of the race in late December. This left only the three frontrunners for the second and final debate.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === January 5th ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | The second [[Quentinian Environmentalist Party|Environmentalist Party]] debate was held on January 5th, 2021, and featured three candidates from around the country. Unlike in the first debate, only the five highest polling candidates were eligible to participate, however [[Daniel Stevenson]] and [[Xavier Ravenson]] both dropped out of the race in December, leaving only three remaining. The debate was held at [[Forest Grove Center]] in [[Greenscoast]], [[Snowland]] from 8:00 to 10:00 PM, and it was covered by [[Diamond Television Network|DTN]] and [[Quentinian Broadcasting Corporation|QBC]] on television, and [[Tennomore Broadcasting System|TBS]] on radio and television. The moderator for the debate was [[Kacey Wallinsworth]], from the [[Beach Haven Times]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | The participants in the second debate are listed below, along with their home state, prior experience, their polling percentages after the first debate but before the second, and the main member of the convention who sponsored them for the debate.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :{| class="wikitable sortable" |Style: Width=100%
| |
| − | !width=20% | Candidate !! State !! Experience !! Preliminary Polling !! Convention Support
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Gretchen DeArmant]] || [[Maxx Area]] || Former Environmentalist Activist || 47.1% || [[Claire Revishiose]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Clint Toll]] || [[Snowland]] || Executive National Security Adviser || 42.1% || [[Rebecca Lauxecz]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Dean Thomas]] || [[Snowland]] || Bureaucrat || 7.9% || [[Alissa Santiago]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Results and Primary'''
| |
| − | | |
| − | :{| class="wikitable sortable" |Style: Width=20%
| |
| − | !width=98% | Candidate !! Polling !! Change
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Gretchen DeArmant]] || 49.1% || +2%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Clint Toll]] || 39.1% || -3%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | [[Dean Thomas]] || 11.8% || 3.9%
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | | |
| − | The results of the second debate saw a general decline in the popularity of Clint Toll, however he was still the second highest polling candidate at the end of the debate. Gretchen DeArmant continued to increase her popularity, performing well at the debate and retaining the highest spot in terms of polling. Dean Thomas, however, had perhaps the greatest gain from the second debate, gaining 3.9% in the polls and becoming viewed as a viable compromise candidate for the party. DeArmant was viewed as the most radical of the three candidates, and as a result of this, in early February Dean Thomas withdrew from the race, throwing his support behind Toll for the presidency.
| |
| − | | |
| − | On March 15th, the [[2021 Quentinian Environmentalist Presidential Primaries]] began, with registered Environmentalists across the country voting for their preferred candidate to win the endorsement of the Environmentalist Party, either Gretchen DeArmant or Clint Toll. On March 16th, results came in for the primary, concluding that Clint Toll had won the support of the party's members to run for President. In a traditional show of unity, DeArmant withdrew from the race on the 17th, even though the [[2021 Quentinian Environmentalist Party Convention|Party Convention]] had not yet officially voted on the winner, and threw her full support behind Toll for President.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Freelance Party Debates ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Minor Party Debates ==
| |
